https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=7QwnQC0AAAAJ&view_op=list_works&authuser=4&gmla=AH70aAXSgsGfbihg4XfTuewCeQeYGy1HTwvT72Ir9iHrnZEDh1XFE7EzcqgkFv5kr1vS-lIMrz6MeOglUi59DhKE

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Surveying Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Vertical Skewness is a prevalent anomaly in the field of geodetic science, which arises due to the displacement of the vertical ‎component on the geoid at various locations. This discrepancy directly impacts both horizontal and vertical angles that are ‎observed, and indirectly influences measurements of lengths. When considering the adjustment of length conversions to the ‎horizon, this phenomenon is adequately represented by vertical angles. Consequently, vertical angles assume a significant role ‎in ameliorating the effects of geoid updrafts and ensuring the precision of length determinations.‎
The occurrence of refraction exerts a substantial influence on observations of angles. This impact, particularly on the vertical ‎angle, possesses a considerable magnitude that gives rise to a substantial discrepancy when adjusting the transformation of ‎lengths to the horizon. A prevalent approach employed to mitigate the influence of refraction involves the simultaneous ‎measurement of vertical angles in both directions at two distinct endpoints of equivalent distances.‎
Methods: There exist two primary categories of coordinate system commonly employed to express the positions of points in geodesy. ‎These categories are known as the geocentric coordinate system, which centers on the Earth, and the topocentric coordinate ‎system, which also centers on the Earth. In the geocentric coordinate system, the origin of the coordinates coincides with the ‎Earth's center of gravity, and the z-axis is defined in alignment with the Earth's epoch axis. On the other hand, in the ‎topocentric coordinate system, the origin of the coordinates corresponds to a specific point on the Earth's surface, namely the ‎location of the camera. Furthermore, the z-axis in this coordinate system corresponds to the surface of the parallel potential ‎passing over the aforementioned point where the camera is situated, also known as the line of work passing over the point.‎
Geodetic measurements of both horizontal and vertical angles are conducted within topocentric coordinate systems. As ‎indicated, the prevailing technique for mitigating the impact of refraction on vertical angles involves simultaneously reading ‎said angles from both the initial and terminal positions along the lengths. Given that the starting and ending points of the ‎lengths exhibit dissimilar vertical extensions on the potential surface, the measurement of the vertical angle, and consequently ‎the correction of the length's conversion to the horizon, are subjected to a significant degree of error.‎
Findings: The current investigation comprehensively examines this error and its consequential impacts on the horizontal spacing of points ‎within small-scale geodesic networks. To achieve this objective, four specific regions in Sweden characterized by accurate ‎geoids were meticulously chosen, and an elliptical procedure was implemented on the geoid of these regions to determine the ‎parameters of the geoid surface. Furthermore, the geoid surface was computed.‎
Conclusion: The findings of this investigation demonstrate that the significance of the skewness of geoid gauges is evident even in geodetic ‎networks of small‏-‏scales, and should not be disregarded. It is important to consider that the assessment of the magnitude of ‎the skewness effect of geoid perpendiculars is only feasible in areas where a precise geoid is present. Consequently, it ‎becomes unfeasible to entirely eliminate this effect when observing vertical angles simultaneously in areas lacking accurate ‎geoids. Consequently, an alternative approach must be employed to rectify the conversion to the mile-long horizon. Further ‎examination of this alternative method is presented in subsequent sections of this scholarly article.‎

Keywords

Main Subjects

COPYRIGHTS 
© 2024 The Author(s).  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)  

[1] Shirazian, Masoud, Mohammad Bagherbandi, and Hamed Karimi. "Network-aided reduction of slope distances in small-scale geodetic control networks." Journal of Surveying Engineering 147.4 (2021): 04021024.
[2] Ågren, Jonas, et al. "Noggrann höjdbestämning med den nya nationella geoidmodellen SWEN17_RH2000." Swedish.] In Proc., Conf. on Kartdagarna. Gävle, Sweden: Lantmäteriet. 2018.
[3] Bagherbandi, Mohammad, et al. "Physical and geometric effects on the classical geodetic observations in small-scale control networks." Journal of Surveying Engineering 149.1 (2023): 04022014.
[4] Ashkenazi, V., and P. D. Howard. "An empirical method for refraction modelling in trigonometrical heighting." Survey Review 27.213 (1984): 311-322.
[5] Bell B. The use and calibration of the Kern ME5000 Mekometer: Proceedings. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA (United States); 1992 Sep 1.
[6] Hooijberg, Maarten. Geometrical geodesy. Springer, Berlin, 2008.
[7] Kurylev Y, Lassas M, Uhlmann G. Rigidity of broken geodesic flow and inverse problems. American journal of mathematics. 2010;132(2):529-62.
[8] Brunner FK. Geodetic refraction. Berlin: Shringer. 1984;216.
[9] Dodson, A. H., and M. Zaher. "Refraction effects on vertical angle measurements." Survey Review 28.217 (1985): 169-183.
[10] Ekman, Martin, and Jonas Agren. Reanalysing astronomical coordinates of old fundamental observatories using satellite positioning and deflections of the vertical. Åland Islands, Sweden: Summer Institute for Historical Geophysics, 2010.
[11] Featherstone WE, Rüeger JM. The importance of using deviations of the vertical for the reduction of survey data to a geocentric datum. Australian surveyor. 2000 Dec 1;45(2):46-61.
[12] Amiri-Simkooei, Ali Reza, et al. "Basic concepts of optimization and design of geodetic networks." Journal of Surveying Engineering 138.4 (2012): 172-183.
[13] Bagherbandi M, Shirazian M, Ågren J, Horemuz M. Physical and geometric effects on the classical geodetic observations in small-scale control networks. Journal of Surveying Engineering. 2023 Feb 1;149(1):04022014.
[14] Hirt C, Seeber G. Astrogeodätische Lotabweichungsbestimmung mit dem digitalen Zenitkamerasystem TZK2-D. ZfV-Zeitschrift für Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement. 2002;127:388-96.
[15] Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Wasle E. GNSS–global navigation satellite systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more. Springer Science & Business Media; 2007 Nov 20.
[16] Jekeli, Ch. "An analysis of vertical deflections derived from high-degree spherical harmonic models." Journal of Geodesy 73 (1999): 10-22.
[17] Hooijberg M. Practical geodesy: using computers. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012 Dec 6.
[18] Lindbom J, Tirén K. Kvalitetsundersökning av Laserdata Skog: Terrängtypens inverkan på punktmolnets återgivning av markytan.
[19] Meyer, Thomas H., and Ahmed F. Elaksher. "Solving the multilateration problem without iteration." Geomatics 1.3 (2021): 324-334.
[20] Featherstone WE, Kirby JF, Hirt C, Filmer MS, Claessens SJ, Brown NJ, Hu G, Johnston GM. The AUSGeoid09 model of the Australian height datum. Journal of Geodesy. 2011 Mar;85:133-50.
[21] Brisco, B., et al. "Precision agriculture and the role of remote sensing: a review." Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 24.3 (1998): 315-327.
[22] Vincenty T. Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Survey review. 1975 Apr 1;23(176):88-93.
[23] Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of geophysical research: solid earth. 2012 Apr;117(B4)
[24] Rapp, Richard H. Geometric geodesy part I. Ohio State University Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, 1991.
[25] Rapp RH. Geometric geodesy part I. Ohio State University Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying; 1991.
[26] Schaffrin B. Aspects of network design. InOptimization and design of geodetic networks 1985 (pp. 548-597). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[27] Awange JL, Faisal Anwar AH, Forootan E, Nikraz H, Khandu K, Walker J. Enhancing civil engineering surveying learning through workshops. Journal of Surveying Engineering. 2017 Aug 1;143(3):05017001.
[28] Sjöberg, Lars E., and Mohammad Bagherbandi. Gravity inversion and integration. Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017.
[29] Schroedel, Joseph. "Engineering and Design-Structural Deformation Surveying." US Army Corps of Engineers (2002): 20314-1000.
[30] Vanicek, Petr, and Edward J. Krakiwsky. Geodesy: the concepts. Elsevier, 2015.
[31] Vincenty T. Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Survey review. 1975 Apr 1;23(176):88-93.